search

Qianhui Tang vs Kristen Seabury Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tang vs Seabury analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Qianhui Tang vs Kristen Seabury Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Tang 1 - 0 Seabury

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tang has won 42.8% of points on their second serve, while Seabury has won 14.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tang, in recent form, has won 54.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Seabury has won 31.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.27% and 17.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Tang has saved 55.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Seabury has saved 32.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Tang has won 43.75% of matches played (W/L 7/ 9), with Seabury winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Tang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 58/ 54), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13). Seabury has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 6% (W/L 1/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
  • Player level: In the last year, Tang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 7/ 9), where as Seabury has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tang winning 1 times and Seabury being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tang winning 2 and Seabury winning 0. The last match between Tang and Seabury was at the W15 Jakarta, 13-03-2023, Q2 round, Hard with Qianhui Tang getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:36:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Tang and Seabury have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tang winning 0 times and Seabury 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tang winning 0, and Seabury 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tang has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.63 while Seabury has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tang has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Seabury has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Tang has converted 41.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Seabury has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Qianhui Tang

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

887

Rank

617

High

23

Age

Plays

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

36

Age

Plays

Kristen Seabury

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L L L L W W W L W L

Form

L L L L L L L L L L

51% (73-71)

Career Total W/L

5% (1-19)

44% (4-5)

YTD W/L

0% (0-5)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Qianhui Tang vs Kristen Seabury For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Tang VS Seabury

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Tang VS Seabury H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Qianhui Tang Kristen Seabury
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 0
Aces (Total) 6 0
DFs Total 0 9
Avg Match Time 0:36:0 0:36:0
1st Serve % 78% (21/27) 50% (14/28)
1st Serve Win% 95% (20/21) 21% (3/14)
2nd Serve Win% 67% (4/6) 7% (1/14)
BPs Won% (Total) 100% (6/6) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 86% (24/28) 11% (3/27)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Tang VS Seabury H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-0 6-0
cross
Qianhui Tang
Player
Kristen Seabury
78% ( 21 of 27)
1st Serve %
50% ( 14 of 28)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
95% ( 20 of 21)
1st Serve Won
21% ( 3 of 14)
67% ( 4 of 6)
2nd Serve Won
7% ( 1 of 14)
100% ( 6 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
11% ( 3 of 27)
Rtn Points Won
86% ( 24 of 28)
48
Total Points Won
7

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Qianhui Tang Kristen Seabury
YTD W/L 44% (4/5) 0% (0/5)
Sets Win/Loss 48% (11/12) 0% (0/10)
Games Win/Loss 48% (104/111) 8% (5/57)
Hard Win/Loss 50% (3/3) 0% (0/4)
Clay Win/Loss 50% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/1) 0% (0/1)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.26 0.07
Aces Total 27 2
DFs per game 0.31 0.97
DFs Total 33 29
Avg Match Time 2:1:33 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 397.56 0
1st Serve % 63% (470/741) 59% (83/140)
1st Serve W% 61% (288/470) 46% (38/83)
2nd Serve W% 43% (116/271) 14% (8/57)
BPs Won% Total 42% (39/93) 50% (1/2)
Return Pts W% 44% (328/747) 23% (29/128)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 44% (4/5) 0% (0/3)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/2)
Best of 3 Sets W% 44% (4/9) 0% (0/5)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 50% (1/2) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 40% (2/5) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 67% (3/2) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 33% (3/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 33% (6/2) 0% (5/0)

Qianhui Tang Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
cross
Daniela Vismane
Player
Qianhui Tang
70% ( 42 of 60)
1st Serve %
61% ( 34 of 56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
57% ( 24 of 42)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 16 of 34)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 6 of 22)
58% ( 7 of 12)
Break Points Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
48% ( 29 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 34 of 56)
65
Total Points Won
51
L
6-2 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Qianhui Tang
Player
Sofia Shapatava
66% ( 57 of 87)
1st Serve %
73% ( 80 of 110)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63% ( 36 of 57)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 43 of 80)
33% ( 10 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 11 of 30)
37% ( 7 of 19)
Break Points Won
50% ( 5 of 10)
47% ( 41 of 87)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 56 of 110)
102
Total Points Won
95
W
3-6 6-1 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Xinxin Yao
Player
Qianhui Tang
69% ( 25 of 36)
1st Serve %
60% ( 24 of 40)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76% ( 19 of 25)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 13 of 24)
64% ( 7 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 4 of 16)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
28% ( 10 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 23 of 40)
49
Total Points Won
27
L
6-1 4-1 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Qianhui Tang
Player
Misaki Matsuda
65% ( 69 of 106)
1st Serve %
78% ( 84 of 108)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
59% ( 41 of 69)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 46 of 84)
54% ( 20 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 11 of 24)
50% ( 8 of 16)
Break Points Won
36% ( 5 of 14)
42% ( 45 of 106)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 51 of 108)
112
Total Points Won
102
W
6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Qianhui Tang
Player
Ho Ching Wu
62% ( 58 of 94)
1st Serve %
60% ( 47 of 78)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
67% ( 39 of 58)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 32 of 47)
50% ( 18 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 14 of 31)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
39% ( 37 of 94)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 32 of 78)
89
Total Points Won
83
W
7-6(12) 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Qianhui Tang
Player
Chia Yi Tsao
56% ( 33 of 59)
1st Serve %
60% ( 38 of 63)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76% ( 25 of 33)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 25 of 38)
50% ( 13 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 9 of 25)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
36% ( 21 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 29 of 63)
67
Total Points Won
55
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Ayla Aksu
Player
Qianhui Tang
57% ( 55 of 96)
1st Serve %
68% ( 88 of 130)
2
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
60% ( 33 of 55)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 49 of 88)
41% ( 17 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 15 of 42)
36% ( 9 of 25)
Break Points Won
64% ( 7 of 11)
48% ( 46 of 96)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 66 of 130)
116
Total Points Won
110
L
6-3 4-6 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
Ena Shibahara
Player
Qianhui Tang
59% ( 48 of 81)
1st Serve %
64% ( 44 of 69)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71% ( 34 of 48)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 26 of 44)
61% ( 20 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 14 of 25)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
33% ( 27 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 29 of 69)
83
Total Points Won
67
L
6-3 3-6 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Qianhui Tang
58% ( 67 of 115)
1st Serve %
63% ( 63 of 100)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
66% ( 44 of 67)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 43 of 63)
48% ( 23 of 48)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 16 of 37)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
25% ( 4 of 16)
42% ( 48 of 115)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 41 of 100)
108
Total Points Won
107
L
4-6 7-5 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Qianhui Tang
72% ( 62 of 86)
1st Serve %
77% ( 50 of 65)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
55% ( 34 of 62)
1st Serve Won
42% ( 21 of 50)
33% ( 8 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 5 of 15)
78% ( 7 of 9)
Break Points Won
45% ( 5 of 11)
51% ( 44 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 39 of 65)
81
Total Points Won
70
L
6-2 7-6(8) H2H

Kristen Seabury Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
L
6-1 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Lilitha Sithenkosi Ndungane
Player
Kristen Seabury
57% ( 13 of 23)
1st Serve %
56% ( 15 of 27)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
92% ( 12 of 13)
1st Serve Won
40% ( 6 of 15)
80% ( 8 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 3 of 12)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
13% ( 3 of 23)
Rtn Points Won
67% ( 18 of 27)
38
Total Points Won
12
L
6-1 3-0 ret. H2H
Q1
cross
Eva Swiderek
Player
Kristen Seabury
69% ( 27 of 39)
1st Serve %
56% ( 22 of 39)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
78% ( 21 of 27)
1st Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
42% ( 5 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
18% ( 3 of 17)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
33% ( 13 of 39)
Rtn Points Won
69% ( 27 of 39)
53
Total Points Won
25
L
6-1 6-0 H2H
Q1
cross
Jada Robinson
Player
Kristen Seabury
85% ( 23 of 27)
1st Serve %
58% ( 21 of 36)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
87% ( 20 of 23)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 10 of 21)
100% ( 4 of 4)
2nd Serve Won
0% ( 0 of 15)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
11% ( 3 of 27)
Rtn Points Won
72% ( 26 of 36)
50
Total Points Won
13
L
6-0 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Madison Rose
Player
Kristen Seabury
54% ( 21 of 39)
1st Serve %
66% ( 25 of 38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
76% ( 16 of 21)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 13 of 25)
72% ( 13 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
15% ( 2 of 13)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
26% ( 10 of 39)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 23 of 38)
52
Total Points Won
25
L
6-1 6-0 H2H
Q1
L
6-0 6-0 H2H
Q1
L
6-0 6-0 H2H
Q1
L
6-0 6-3 H2H
Q1
L
6-0 6-0 H2H
Q1
L
6-0 6-0 H2H

Tang Vs Seabury Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Tang are available here and Seabury photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions